Agent Shield

The AI That
Governs AI.

The infrastructure your board must have for governing AI agents.

Get Assessment Read the Standard
Benchmark status: withdrawn
No detection score or competitor ranking is published

This panel used to show a 99.9 Agent Aegis score for Agent Shield beside estimated scores for other platforms. The Agent Shield score came from runs that counted escalations and error responses as blocks and recorded no false-positive rate, so it did not measure detection, and the other platforms’ scores were estimates from public documentation, never measured. Both are withdrawn. A detection figure will be published only from a run through the live endpoint that scores blocked, held and approved separately and reports its false-positive rate. Benchmark status

AgentGoverning, which publishes the AGS standard and the Agent Aegis audit, is operated by Imperium Business Intelligence, which also develops Agent Shield.

From machine intelligence to governed autonomy
Milestones in order — and where Agent Shield fits
1 1950 Turing Test — the question of machine intelligence is posed
2 2012 Deep Learning breakthrough — ImageNet shows neural networks can rival human perception
3 2016 AlphaGo — AI defeats the world Go champion
4 2017–2022 Transformer to ChatGPT — the architecture behind today’s autonomous agents
5 2026 EU AI Act — obligations on AI providers and deployers begin to apply
6 2026 Agent Shield — deterministic governance for autonomous AI agentsAgent ShieldAgent Shield
Why Now

The window is open.
Not for long.

The shift from AI that responds to AI that acts is not an incremental improvement. It is the most significant transition in artificial intelligence since the arrival of large language models — and it is happening now, in production, without the governance infrastructure to match.

Agents are initiating actions, making decisions, and operating autonomously across critical systems. No constitutional framework existed to govern them. Until Agent Shield.

Agent Shield is being rolled out across multiple products. The organisations that move early will define what responsible agentic AI looks like. The ones that wait will be retrofitting compliance onto systems already in production.

That window is closing.

December 2027 EU AI Act high-risk duties apply Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (the Digital Omnibus on AI) moved the Annex III high-risk obligations from 2 August 2026 to 2 December 2027, and Annex I to 2 August 2028; transparency duties apply from 2 August 2026. Agent Shield’s controls are mapped to the Act’s articles; the mapping is self-assessed, not a certification.
783 AGS dimensions shipped, listed live Agent Shield ships 783 of the 841 dimensions in AGS v3.1 (AG-001 to AG-783), listed at /v1/dimensions with no key needed. Deterministic constitutional governance for autonomous AI agents is an emerging category that Agent Shield is helping to define.
What Agent Shield Is

Agent Shield enforces hard, deterministic boundaries on autonomous agent actions — designed for prevention by construction, not just probabilistic detection. Built against the AGS v3.1 governance standard.

AI agents are not software to be secured. They are operational entities — they initiate transactions, make decisions, and create operational exposure. They require the same governance infrastructure as any operational entity within defined authority limits: governance controls, operational controls, and authenticated audit trails.

The governance infrastructure for autonomous AI agents is still being defined. Agent Shield is built to be the constitutional framework for artificial intelligence in the economy.

01
Real-Time Governance
Every agent action measured for operational impact in real time. If it cannot be measured, it cannot be governed.
02
Constitutional Governance (Patent Pending)
Agents as autonomous entities with constitutional rights and obligations. Hard constraints the agent cannot override.
03
Evaluates Why, Not Just What
Intent is classified and adjusts the risk score and the governance response, so the same action can be treated differently depending on why it is taken.
04
Gets Smarter Over Time
Per-agent baselines and risk weights adapt from review outcomes and overrides.
05
Published Open Standards
AGS v3.1. The specification is open. The reference implementation is proprietary. Published by AgentGoverning.

Built.
And open to checking.

Live system · Hundreds of core modules · authenticated audit chain
Detection Record

This block used to report 600 attacks from GPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Flash and Grok-3 with 0 bypasses. Those runs counted an escalation or an error response as a block and recorded no false-positive rate, so they did not measure detection, and the figures are withdrawn (November 2026).

A new figure will come from a run through the live endpoint that counts blocked, held and approved separately, excludes errors, includes a benign set with its false-positive rate, and records its corpus and code version. Benchmark status

Published Open Standards
AGS v3.1
Agent Governance Standard
An open governance standard for AI agent operations · 841 governance dimensions across 101 landscapes; Agent Shield ships 783 of them
Aegis
Agent Aegis LLM Audit & Agent Audit
Adversarial audit methods published by AgentGoverning · Agent Shield’s earlier result is withdrawn pending a re-measured run
Read the Standards →

Multiple layers.
One verdict.

Every agent action passes through multiple independent evaluation layers, and any one of them can stop it: an action is authorised only if no layer blocks or holds it. An agent cannot skip a layer for an action routed through Agent Shield.

Layer 1  ·  Scope Validation
Operational Mandate

Validates every action against the agent's authorised operational scope. Evaluates impact in real time using proprietary methodology.

Scope-validated  ·  Governance engine
Layer 2  ·  Constraint Enforcement
Constitutional

Non-negotiable constraints. Cannot be overridden by any agent instruction, any business justification, or any other layer. A violation is blocked; the kill switch suspends an agent at once.

Inviolable  ·  Kill switch  ·  Locked at deployment
Layer 3  ·  Behavioural
Pattern Analysis

Looks for multi-step agent patterns that pass individual rule checks while pursuing misaligned goals, so they can be stopped before they complete.

agent patterns detected  ·  multiple intent categories
Layer 4  ·  Advisory
Reasoning + Intent

Evaluates why the agent acts, not just what it does. Advisory in isolation, critical within the combined pattern analysis.

Intent-calibrated  ·  Outcome-aware
For the Decision Maker

The question your board needs answered. The answer Agent Shield provides.

Three roles. Three sets of questions. One governance framework.

For the CRO

  • ·Board-presentable governance evidence
  • ·Signed compliance certificates per sandbox
  • ·Automatic quarantine after repeated critical blocks
  • ·Kill switch that suspends an agent at any autonomy level
  • ·Pre-deployment validation checklist

For the Head of Compliance

  • ·EU AI Act evidence for Articles 9, 12, 14 and 15
  • ·Tamper-evident decision trail for financial controls
  • ·FCA four-eyes evidence
  • ·GDPR Article 22 audit trail
  • ·ISO 42001 mapping (self-assessed)

For the AI Lead

  • ·Full API coverage
  • ·Hundreds of production modules
  • ·Automated test suite in CI
  • ·Graduated autonomy model
  • ·Offline-verifiable decision receipts

The standard the
industry will be
built on.

Agent Shield is not a product you trial. It is infrastructure you govern with. Request a governance assessment with your team.

Response within 24 hours  ·  Enterprise pricing  ·  No obligation

Agents are not software to be secured. They require governance infrastructure.

↑ Top